How to employ decision making theories as part of being an advanced Essay

How to use up decision qualification theories as part of being an advanced practitioner in unfavorable heraldic bearing, compare and contrast theories - Essay ExampleMuch technological evolution has taken place in the critical care segment which provides potential for significant improvement in health care. The key to good decision making is the understanding of existing demands of critical care and the ability to predict the likely effects of changing capacity and organization (Montgomery, Lipshitz and Brehmer, 2005). The changing capacity and organization can be measured by employ a historical data and validating them with models at the individual level. Practitioners take aim important clinical decisions that consent a great impact on the tolerants care and the performance of the nurses as rise (Young, 2008). Changes in the technology development, health care settings and new methods of patient care have increased the immenseness of clinical decision making. In order to take care of patients, clinical decision making is astray used by nurses and practitioners. Clinical decision making is a phenomenon that is frequently used in many areas of practice which involves stages of patient judging, determining, accepting or rejecting the diagnosis, and selecting the best care strategies for patients (Standing, 2008). Critical care is different from separate areas of nursing and thus the importance of clinical decision making increases (Chapman and Sonnenberg, 2003). Nurses are dealing with patients whose conditions change rapidly. So time is a limitation in this case (Chitty, 2005). A recent study shows that nurse make decisions in every 30 seconds about one of the following incidents nursing interventions, communicating information and evaluating the patients conditions (Rycroft-Malone and Bucknall, 2010). So decision making for them is dynamic and unpredictable. The Process of Decision-Making Clinical decision making requires the beforehand(predic ate) development of hypothesis diagnosis (Ramezani-Badr, Nasrabadi, Nikbakht, Zohre and Taleghani, 2009). The further data collection will be aimed at every approving or disproving the diagnosis. Specialist practitioners are generally trained to think in a exceptional way. They use the evidence based system to in their decision making process (King, Duke and OConnor, 2009). health check evidence is non normally concerned with broader patient concerns but accepting it routinely influences clinical recommendations (Chiappelli, 2010). However, this does not preclude that additional information is not needed in order to provide a more than complete profile of each patient. The diverse nature of information is potentially valuable as wellspring as the quality of interaction between the team members (McGloin and Mcleod, 2010). Team decisions are expected to arrive at decision routes that are different from those taken by individuals working alone (Perkins, Jensen, Jaccard, Gollwitzer , Oettingen and Pappadopulos et al, 2007). This also has an ethical side associated to it in terms of counterbalancing any personal judgments formulated (Morrison and Monagle, 2009). This is because individual decisions are based on the speciate findings, so judgments can easily be covered by personal prejudice (Eccles et al, 2007). This will hardly serve the need of the practitioner more than the patient (Devettere, 2009). Effective vs. Ineffective Decision-Making Effective use of assessment information through decision making process is essential to improve the outcome of the critical care (Gambrill, 2005). The process of decision making can be seen from a variety of angles. Ineffective decision making may have serious