Monday, January 13, 2020
Do you agree with the view that the Beatles ââ¬Åchanged the world in the sixtiesââ¬Â? Essay
Itââ¬â¢s clear from any angle that The Beatles had an incredible impact on the world in the sixties, but I think itââ¬â¢s evident stating they ââ¬Å"changed the worldâ⬠is going too far, and in actual fact they merely reflected a changing world. Source 18 mentions the view that ââ¬Å"The Beatles changed the world in the sixtiesâ⬠, and it references to some of the contemporary debates from the decade, which the four-man band had an influence on: ââ¬Å"legalization of drugs, the war in Vietnamâ⬠and ââ¬Å"traditional and alternate religionsâ⬠. Ian Inglis also declares them as one of the ââ¬Å"twentieth centuryââ¬â¢s more significant achievementsâ⬠which is true to an extent ââ¬â some of their views and actions on the decades disputes were eye-openers to society. Although, source 18 also makes the comment that the band are ââ¬Å"innovatorsâ⬠, which is supported by source 17ââ¬â¢s view theyââ¬â¢re not the ââ¬Å"architectsâ⬠of the ââ¬Å"new youth cultureâ⬠. This shows it the counter argument: they voiced a shifting world and society. To say the Beatles ââ¬Å"changed the world in the sixtiesâ⬠holds some truth ââ¬â they were the first band to speak out about the Vietnam War, the first band to openly experiment with alternate religions and criticize other traditional faiths and the only band to publically call for the legalization of marijuana. So source 18ââ¬â¢s view that the four men were ââ¬Å"prominent across a wide range of categoriesâ⬠including ââ¬Å"historical, sociological, cultural and musicalâ⬠and that ââ¬Å"their opinions were sought out, heard and acted onâ⬠is obviously evident ââ¬â especially when relating to the bands protests against the Vietnam War. Perhaps one of the bands most famous demonstrations, in 1965, sent shock waves through the country ââ¬â the Beatles were the first band to be honored with the nations highest award, but Lennon rejected his to protest against Britainââ¬â¢s involvement in the war with Vietnam. He also coined the renowned phrases ââ¬Å"make love not warâ⬠and ââ¬Å"give peace a chanceâ⬠. Itââ¬â¢s obviously apparent that the band voiced and shaped some of the strongest protests against the cruel war ââ¬â they helped to expose to society how bad the situation was in Vietnam, giving the conflict details higher awareness than before. Without their high profile protests, itââ¬â¢s hard to say how the population would have reacted to the horrifying circumstances of the war, but the Beatles gave them a route to take, they used the population to support their view against conflict and unnecessary deaths, therefore this argues that the band changed the world to manipulate their opinions. Supporting this is the negativity in source 16,Lennon says ââ¬Å"the same idiots are running everythingâ⬠ââ¬â his insulting words, aimed at the government, are acceptable considering the war is still current in 1971 when the statement is made, heââ¬â¢s angry at the pointless fighting and deaths- much like the rest of the population. The Beatles involvement with alternate religions made headlines and influenced a higher awareness in the world; therefore this could also argue the view that they changed the world. ââ¬Å"Indian Mysticismâ⬠and ââ¬Å"Transcendental Meditationâ⬠were two of the faiths they experimented with, however it was their dismissal of the Christian/Catholic belief that was the bigger impact ââ¬â source 18 supports the idea they made ââ¬Å"significant achievementsâ⬠in the ââ¬Å"cultural categoryâ⬠. George Harrison was the first member of the band to experiment with a new religion ââ¬â Hinduism which he took interest in after being handed a book on reincarnation during the filming of ââ¬Å"Help!â⬠in 1965, the other members shortly followed suit. Their choices to explore other faiths and cultures became high profile and famous decisions ââ¬â 65 reporters followed the four men when they travelled to India in February 1968, where they advanced in meditation classes and followed the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi religion. All of this was new and exciting or shocking to western civilization ââ¬â no one of high status had done outrageous things like this and therefore it encouraged the more rebellious youth culture to change. Not only did their views on alternate religions make headlines, so did their opinions on traditional faiths. August 1964, the Beatles press officer said the band were ââ¬Å"so anti-Christ they shock me which isnââ¬â¢t an easy thingâ⬠ââ¬â this opinion is furthered by Lennonââ¬â¢s 1970 song ââ¬Å"Godâ⬠in which he sings ââ¬Å"I donââ¬â¢t believe in Jesusâ⬠and ââ¬Å"I donââ¬â¢t believe in Bibleâ⬠. Also notice the lyrics his 1970 song Imagine, ââ¬Å"imagine thereââ¬â¢s no heavenâ⬠¦ no hell below usâ⬠¦ no religion tooâ⬠. The sixties was still a time where traditional faith was strong, people went to church every Sunday and the contraceptive pillà was only legalized in 1961 ââ¬â so for the four men to openly express theyââ¬â¢re non-believers, it was shocking. New youth culture would have seen it as an escape to live life with more freedom, as the older and younger generation gap was wider than ever ââ¬â young people looked up to the band as idols. The famous four lead this contemporary debate more than other factors did ââ¬â they helped to shape a new younger religious culture, supported by source 17, they made new religion and dismissal of the traditional ââ¬Å"instantly chic for the millions of fans who looked to the group for guidanceâ⬠. Furthermore, the Beatles drug use was constantly in the press during the sixties ââ¬â a time where the world learnt more and more about different pills, inhalants and injections. Source 18 states that the Beatles opinions on the ââ¬Å"legalization of drugsâ⬠were ââ¬Å"sought out, heard and acted onâ⬠ââ¬â particularly in 1967 when the four young men called for the ââ¬Ëlegalization of marijuanaââ¬â¢ through an advertisement in The Times. This was a big thing ââ¬â it was a fairly new drugs in UK and American culture, before the sixties tobacco and alcohol were the only widespread drugs. Although their plea didnââ¬â¢t work, the advertisement still created higher awareness of the hallucinogenic drug, which encouraged more people to try or use it. In 2004, Paul McCartney admitted they used drugs as an influence to most of their music ââ¬â including ââ¬Å"Got to Get You in my Lifeâ⬠which was about cannabis and confessed the infamous suspicion that ââ¬Å"Lucy in the Sky with Diamondsâ⬠was about LSD. By the late sixties the band had managed to change how the youth spent their time ââ¬â the younger generations now started to hang out in private open areas, listening to their psychedelic rock, growing their hair long, dressing in colourful clothes and taking mind-altering drugs ââ¬â the hippie era had begun. Although, it seems to me, itââ¬â¢s more evident that the Beatles didnââ¬â¢t ââ¬Å"change the world in the sixtiesâ⬠, but in fact they merely reflected a changing world ââ¬â this opinion is supported by both source 17 and 18. Itââ¬â¢s stated by Allan Kozinn in source 17 that ââ¬Å"although they seemed to be the leaders of the new youth culture, they were by no means its architectsâ⬠which is also supported in source 18 by the inclusion of the words ââ¬Å"innovatorsâ⬠and ââ¬Å"spokespersonâ⬠ââ¬â these words infer that the four men were imitating originalà views and opinions. Source 16 also agrees with this opinion to an extent ââ¬â Lennon often had a controversial provenance when talking to the media or the press, in this instance he would be saying ââ¬Å"itââ¬â¢s still the same society and world, yet the middle class people follow our stupid waysâ⬠which refers to the ââ¬Å"itââ¬â¢s exactly the sameâ⬠, ââ¬Å"the bourgeois systemâ⬠and ââ¬Å"we dressed upâ⬠comments. Also with Lennonââ¬â¢s statement we have to consider that in 1971 the band had split ââ¬â this is the same year as the statement was made; therefore itââ¬â¢s going to be negative. Source 17 states that the Beatles had the ââ¬Å"ability to detect trends earlyâ⬠and made them ââ¬Å"instantly chic for millions of fansâ⬠ââ¬â I think itââ¬â¢s evident this was the case for their involvement in the protests against the Vietnam War. The four young men didnââ¬â¢t create the anti-war views and opinions, they already existed among millions of people considering the UK was only just getting better after World War 2, the men simply gave the ideas a louder voice, they catalyzed the protests into the media so larger amounts of people would see and agree. In an interview with Lennon and McCartney, in 1968, they were asked, ââ¬Å"the US has been plagued by the Vietnam War, and the world has been concerned, whatââ¬â¢s your views?â⬠in which Lennon replied, ââ¬Å"itââ¬â¢s another piece of insanity.â⬠In the question we can understand that the rest of the world had the same views as the Beatles did, the four men are repeating the views to create higher awareness and support ââ¬â evidence of media manipulation. Two years earlier, during a press conference in New York, George Harrison made a similar reply to a similar question: ââ¬Å"itââ¬â¢s just war is wrong and itââ¬â¢s obvious itââ¬â¢s wrongâ⬠ââ¬â using the word obvious shows that he knows itââ¬â¢s a widespread opinion. Through all of this we can see that the band werenââ¬â¢t alone on their views and opinions ââ¬â in fact I think that most of their ideas they will have heard before from their elders. They use their popularity and status to showcase the concerns the public have had for many years, the issue of the Vietnam War is horrifying and disturbing to many of the younger and older generations ââ¬â most people would want a stop to it straight away, source 18 supports this argument through the words ââ¬Å"innovatorsâ⬠and ââ¬Å"spokespersonsâ⬠. Arguing this even further is their 1968 song ââ¬Å"Revolutionâ⬠which includes the lyrics: ââ¬Å"we all want to change the world, you tell me thatââ¬â¢s evolutionââ¬â¢, this inclusion of the words ââ¬Å"weâ⬠andà ââ¬Å"youâ⬠makes it sound like their voicing the we as the population (including themselves) and the you is the government/constitutions. Musical influences and voices are used again by Lennon in 1971 in his song ââ¬Å"Imagineâ⬠: ââ¬Å"imagine thereââ¬â¢s no countriesâ⬠¦ nothing to kill or die forâ⬠¦ imagine all the people living in peaceâ⬠. I donââ¬â¢t think it can be said the Beatles changed the worldââ¬â¢s opinion on the Vietnam war ââ¬â here itââ¬â¢s evident that they all have the same view and they simply gave it media coverage and a larger voice due to their popularity. Again, the argument is strengthened by the fact the Beatles religious views didnââ¬â¢t become widespread, nor did they introduce them to the UK in the first place ââ¬â their alternate religions and the high profile reports about these different faiths were not the initial introduction of them into British society. Since amendments were made to the ââ¬ËBritish Nationality lawââ¬â¢ in the 1940s, people from the commonwealth islands (including India) had been immigrating to the UK for nearly 20 years ââ¬â this meant that people of the Hindu and other religions had already introduced these faiths into British society and the world was already changing to be more cultural before the Beatles choice to follow them. The band only created higher popularity for these faiths amongst the population. Also their views on Christianity and Catholicism werenââ¬â¢t widely accepted; 1966 John Lennon made the statement the Beatles were ââ¬Å"more popular than Jesusâ⬠which created uproar in America, especially in the south that are strong Catholics. Younger generations burned all their merchandise and refused to accept the band as role models again. There was no change here taken place, only rejection of the new ââ¬â which opposes sources 17 and 18. However source 16 does support this: ââ¬Å"the whole bourgeois system is exactly the sameâ⬠, Lennon recognizes that they didnââ¬â¢t change the world due to religious or other issues. Despite this, the view that they reflected a changing world is once more reinforced by their drug use mentioned in source 18, which before seemed to be solely created by them ââ¬â but according to Paul McCartney, they were introduced to drugs, before they became famous, whilst they were in Hamburg. He stated, in 2004, that they ââ¬Å"felt everyone was doing themâ⬠and they were ââ¬Å"told to inhale this, but it did nothing for meâ⬠when talking aboutà Benzedrine. This tells us that it wasnââ¬â¢t the Beatles who initiated drug use, but in fact others introduced them to it. Also, relating back to the ââ¬Ëlegalization of marijuanaââ¬â¢ advertisement, we have to consider that it also had signatures from sixty-four other celebrities, including the Rolling Stones who were infamous for their drug and alcohol use, which suggests it was a widespread movement not a singular band who lead the way into the psychedelic era. The wheels of the hippie period had started turning, originating in America in the early sixties, a long time before the Beatles arrived on the drug scene. Seemingly America influenced the Beatles into taking the harder drugs, such as LSD, not visa versa, just the bands music, media coverage and opinions expressed the issue with hallucinogenic drugs more than theyââ¬â¢d been dealt with before. All in all, I think although it could be argued that the Beatles changed the world in the sixties ââ¬â they created leading protests against the Vietnam War, they introduced new religions to the younger generations, they were brave enough to announce their dis-belief in the tradition faiths and created the start of the psychedelic era ââ¬â all of which received great support from the new youth culture. Source 18 supports this thoroughly: ââ¬Å"the Beatles changed the world in the sixtiesâ⬠¦ twentieth century significant achievementâ⬠, source 17 also upkeeps the argument: ââ¬Å"instantly chic for millions of fans who looked to the group for guidanceâ⬠. But, itââ¬â¢s evident that the four menââ¬â¢s involvement with the Vietnam War protests were only echoing the publicââ¬â¢s opinions, that drug use was popular before the band became famous and their religious views didnââ¬â¢t have an affect on the world ââ¬â the Beatles only followed the crowd and their status expressed the issues. Which is again supported through both source 17 and 18: ââ¬Å"although they seemed to be the leaders of the new youth culture, they were by no means its architectsâ⬠, ââ¬Å"innovatorsâ⬠and ââ¬Å"spokespersonsâ⬠. In conclusion I think you can see the shifting world influenced the Beatles views and opinions and it was their famous status that seemed to express new ideas to the youth and society ââ¬â they gathered their anti-war, alternate religions and drug use by things they experienced happening in the moving world of the sixties. Source 16 also disagrees with the statement that the Beatles ââ¬Å"changed the world in the sixtiesâ⬠, Lennon says, ââ¬Å"nothing happenedâ⬠, that the world wasà ââ¬Å"exactly the sameâ⬠and the band ââ¬Å"dressed upâ⬠. Despite it seems heââ¬â¢s recognizing no change, he does notice the four men had a slight influence ââ¬â ââ¬Å"middle-class with long hairâ⬠, their trademark look was popular which they had adopted from the late 50s ââ¬Ëmodââ¬â¢ fashion and the changing ââ¬Ëhippieââ¬â¢ fashions. In conclusion, I donââ¬â¢t think the Beatles changed the world in the sixties, I think itââ¬â¢s evident that the band merely reflected the changing world, giving it a louder voice due to their famous status.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment